Absence of Wike’s lawyer stalls hearing in suit against Atiku’s PDP presidential candidacy

2023: Wike and Atiku will collaborate against the APC — PDP

Nonattendance of Wike’s legal counselor slows down hearing in suit against Atiku’s PDP official candidacy. The nonappearance of Mr Wilfred Okoi, Guidance to Waterways State Lead representative, Nyesom Wike in a lawful activity testing the legitimacy of Atiku Abubakar’s bid as the People groups Progressive faction PDP banner conveyor in the 2023 general political decision on Wednesday slowed down becoming aware of the suit.

Okoi was at the Government High Court promptly in the day and was said to have out of nowhere evolved disorder and needed to leave the court quickly.

A PDP clan leader, Newgent Ekamon, who initiated the suit close by Wike informed Equity Ahmed Ramat Mohammed that the joint legal counselor needed to leave when his wellbeing challenges decayed.

Ekamon begged the Adjudicator to allow a deferment considering the turn of events.

PDP Public Legitimate Guide, Mr Adeyemi Kamaldeen Ajibade, a Senior Promoter of Nigeria SAN didn’t have a problem with the solicitation for change on the ground that anyone can fall debilitated whenever.

Equity Mohammed in this way fixed October 7 for the becoming aware of the suit.

Wike had sued PDP, its official up-and-comer Atiku Abubakar; Sokoto State Lead representative, Aminu Tambuwal over the direct of the official essential of the party held in Abuja on May 28 and May 29, 2022.

In the suit stamped FHC/ABJ/CS/782/2022, Wike and the PDP clan leader, Newgent Ekamon, are the two offended parties.

In the starting summons, PDP is recorded as the principal respondent while the Independent Electoral Commission is the second respondent.

Tambuwal and Atiku are recorded as the third and fourth respondents separately.

In the starting summons, Wike and his co-candidate requested that the court decide eight issues including whether the implied move of Tambuwal’s votes to Atiku by the PDP was unlawful and void.

The offended parties requested that the court decide whether Tambuwal lost his case to votes the second he ventured down for Atiku.

They requested that the court decide if Tambuwal “having ventured down during the primaries should lose his votes.”

LEAVE A REPLY